KDDK Home About KDDK KDDK Practice Areas KDDK Attorneys Careers at KDDK KDDK Newsletters KDDK Happenings Contact KDDK
KDDK Newsletters
Newsletter Archives 2007
Newsletters

   

Newsletter Archives

 

 

Printer Friendly Page

From The KDDK Advantage - August 2007

NLRB Ruling on Union “Salting” Gives Employers Relief
By Jake R. Fulcher

On May 31, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), in Oil Capital Sheet Metal, Inc., provided employers some relief in “salting” cases by announcing a new evidentiary standard for determining the period of backpay.

“Salting” is the term used when a Union asks an organizer to apply for employment with a target company with the intent to organize (unionize) that company. Often the “salt” will campaign for the union both during the job interview and while employed.

This practice can create a conflict because an employer who terminates or refuses to hire a “salt” based on his or her union activity violates the National Labor Relations Act.
As a result, the employer is ordered by the NLRB to pay backwages based on the period of time it is presumed the “salt” would have worked for the company if placed, or kept on its payroll.

Prior to the new ruling, the NLRB applied the presumption that the “salt” would have worked for the company for an indefinite period of time, and it was the employer’s burden to prove otherwise.

But with its recent decision the NLRB has switched the burden of proof and now requires the Union to provide evidence that supports the period of time it claims the “salt” would have been employed.

The NLRB came to this decision by reasoning that the very purpose of a “salt” is to attempt to organize a non-union company and that after some period of time, whether the “salt” is unsuccessful or successful at doing that, the Union often sends the “salt” to the next non-union company.

It was concluded that regardless of the outcome of the “salt’s” efforts, the Union is in a better position than the employer to prove the “salt’s” projected duration of employment for the purpose of determining back pay the company might owe.

Because the NLRB’s ruling was based on a close 3 to 2 decision, it is likely the case will be appealed to the Federal Court, making it possible this ruling will be overturned.

Jake Fulcher speaks often on topics related to labor and employment law. His practices areas are labor & employment law and litigation and trial services. Jake can be reached at jfulcher@kddk.com or at 812-423-3183.

< Renters Gain New Privacy Rights
When Someone Else Owns Minerals On Your Land >
Attorney Notes>>


Home | About Us | Practice Areas | Our Attorneys | Careers | Newsletter | Happenings | Contact UsLinks | Site Map 

KDDK Logo

Kahn, Dees, Donovan & Kahn, LLP
501 Main Street, Suite 305
Evansville, Indiana 47708
Telephone: (812) 423-3183 
Facsimile: (812) 423-3841

Copyright © 2011, Kahn, Dees, Donovan & Kahn, LLP. All Rights Reserved. 
Read our Terms of Use Policy.  Site Designed by The Net Impact